The collapse of the now-bankrupt cryptocurrency alternate FTX has put the Singapore prime minister and the ruling authorities in a scorching seat. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong are set to face grilling questions for his or her failure to guard retail traders.
The Members of Parliament (MP) from the opposition Staff’ celebration raised 15 questions on Temasek’s funding and FTX collapse. The MPs questioned the federal government’s credibility in monitoring the extent of investments by Temasek and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC.
The discussions across the authorities insurance policies whereas investing in digital property might be scrutinized additional in a parliamentary dialogue on Nov. 28, reported a Singaporean each day. The opposition MPs have beneficial a bipartisan committee to query Temasek on its funding methods and danger administration approaches.
Singaporean state-backed investor Temasek was one in every of 69 traders to put money into the FTX crypto alternate’s $420 million funding spherical in October 2021. The agency had invested $210 million within the world alternate for a minority stake of 1% and one other $65 million in its sister firm FTX.US. Nevertheless, the state-backed investor wrote down its total $275 million funding within the crypto alternate “no matter the result of FTX’s chapter safety submitting.”
Associated: The FTX contagion: Which corporations have been affected by the FTX collapse?
Temasek additionally revealed that regardless of eight months of due diligence in 2021, it didn’t discover any vital purple flags in FTXs financials earlier than deciding to take a position $275 million into the now-failed cryptocurrency alternate. Other than Temasek, Sequoia Capital additionally marked down its total $214 million funding within the crypto alternate.
The impression of the FTX collapse has been far-reaching and the worst hit has been thousands and thousands of retail traders whose funds have been misappropriated and utilized by the crypto alternate to mitigate its personal danger. The collapse has additionally led to wider regulatory dialogue and demand for higher regulatory oversight of those centralized entities.
